ML is More Than LLM

A story from Machine Learning Week Europe shows why strong data science is not about using LLMs everywhere, but about selecting the right method, from classic ML to LLMs, for each problem.

Home / / ML is More Than LLM

Let me tell you another story from the Machine Learning Week Europe (MLW). Two years ago, a speaker at MLW presented an LLM solution for extracting information from emails. Their biggest challenge: avoiding prompt injections. 80% of the effort went into LLMOps: securing the operations of the LLM.

During the Q&A participants asked just a few simple questions (I’ll simplify things a bit here):

Q: Why didn’t you just use entity recognition for information extraction?

A: There were too few instances in our dataset for a classic machine learning approach.

Q: Why don’t you ask the customers to use an online form?

A: There is an online form. That’s why we have so few examples – not all customers send us an email. Most use the online form.

Q: So, you have a lot of structured examples in your database?

A: Yes.

Q: You could use an LLM to create synthetic training data, and then use a ‘classic ML approach’ to train an entity recognition model, which would save you a lot of effort with LLMOps.

A: Oh yes, that would have saved us a lot of time.

The famous philosopher Karl Popper once said, “If you know just one solution to a problem, you haven’t understood the problem well enough.

Similarly, if you can only think of an LLM as a solution, then you haven’t understood the problem well enough.

If you only have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

If you only have an LLM, everything looks like an LLM use case.

Just like a good craftsman, a good data scientist should have a well-equipped toolbox. You should know when to use which tool and which technique to solve a problem. That’s what defines expertise.

When expertise reaches its limits, that’s when it’s time for experimentation.

Another example from Machine Learning Week Europe 2025 comes to mind: it was about newsletter recommendation. Traditional techniques like collaborative filtering hadn’t delivered the desired results (because there weren’t that many different newsletters). So they tried an LLM: that worked much better.

These are exactly the kinds of experiences we want to share with each other at Machine Learning Week Europe 2026. Submit your talk for the conference:

👉 https://machinelearningweek.eu/call-for-speakers/

Of course, I’m also available for one-on-one conversations. If you have any questions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send me a private message.

Train. Think. Transform.